I'm going to be a bit more cynical than
Tim about this. 'It's about what
people want to achieve, and using technology if appropriate' is a sentiment constantly expressed at these events: almost a cliche in fact. So why do people feel the need to keep repeating it?
It seems blindingly obvious to me that the technological tools are just that: mere tools to help people do things. Digital engagement should be about using the tools where appropriate, not trying to get people to use them for the sake of it.
Yet much of what I've heard in the last couple of days - despite mantras about 'people first' - is about giving people access to technology,
then helping them to use it. No, it isn't. Or rather, it shouldn't be.
Why are we so enamoured with tools? Yes they're great, yes they enhances our lives; but not by default: they can also be scary, confusing, and dangerous. Why should we have the right to thrust these tools at people because we think they need them?
Thankfully,
the Media Trust's Digital Mentors programme (which is funded by the Departpment for Communities and Local Government) recognises this, and is going to fund individuals or local groups to achieve a goal that they couldn't without digital tools.
To me, this seems the right way round. The equipment is incidental: how it helps people achieve is the important part.
You need to be a member of Digital Engagement to add comments!
Join Digital Engagement